|
August 17, 2007
Dear Mr. UN Secretary General,
Do I have to grow legally-prohibited opium poppies to facilitate your efforts,
and your colleagues' efforts, to destroy your terror victim and cover up your
criminal and terrorist activities and wash President Kim Dae-Jung's hands?
Apr. 08, 2005 — “Growing opium poppies”
UN Secretary General Ban has to respond for the diplomats’ activities related
to use of narcotics among citizens — including the role of numerous diplomats
and medical doctors in this crime.
Even though Ban commits terrorism himself, he urges others not to commit
terrorism.
Ban issued the following statement: “Nothing can justify indiscriminate
violence like that used against civilians.”
Nevertheless, you tried to murder a person in order to implement the
diplomatic philosophy (thinking) or instructions issued by the President.
In order to cover-up your criminal and terrorist activities in Brussels and
Antwerp, you and your colleagues threatened and tortured people using
psychotropic substances — even the medical personnel at a hospital. Furthermore,
you do not hesitate to torture me on the street in downtown Seoul — in the same
way your henchmen behaved in Brussels and Antwerp. Kim Jong-Gil, one of the
President Kim Dae-Jung’s agents, said to me that to expose their activities
would humiliate Korea before the whole world. It was simply your agents’ tactic
to make time to undertake another attempt on me. Now they openly continue their
hideous criminal torture activities unlike before the awarding of the Nobel
Peace Prize.
 
So now, Mr. Ban and President Kim do not only have any intention to stop
these activities but also keep them secret from citizens, You already have
in your hands what you wanted: the Nobel Peace Prize.
When your attempts at bribery —a clear symptom of corruption— failed to
produce the desired results, you threatened my family’s life using them like
hostages.
Publicly, you discourage the taking of hostages just like narcotics, even though
you yourself committed such acts through abduction and murder attempts and using
my family as hostages threatening their safety and their lives. You must have
been very nervous when I managed to escape numerous kidnapping and murder
attempts carried out by your criminals and diplomats —such as
vice-minister-level ambassador Choi Dae-Hwa— in numerous places.
Your henchmen were able to silence me for some time by using my family as
hostages. You must have been deeply relieved at that time. Also, your henchmen
tried to murder me during my silence.
You were deeply relieved by the release of BBC’s Alan Johnston. This is a very
different approach. What was the cause for such a difference? I wish I could
ask BBC’s Alan Johnston a question: Why does one defenseless citizen have to
be the target of powerful persons like President Kim and Ban Ki-Moon, at the
same time as they welcome so warmly and humanely the release of other
hostages.
The act you committed isn't terror? Then what do you call it? Your criminals
said that it was a profitable business.
More explanations are required at this time. The narcotics came from the
embassy. Narcotics were administered to me without my knowledge after the
failure of the Mons military base (US, NATO) plot.
The Military Attaché,
along with Bae Yang-Hong, played a central role
in this crime at the NATO base.
Under President Roh Moo-hyun, Bae Yang-Hong was promoted to Brigadier General
as of January 1, 2004. He called himself Lieutenant Colonel Bae Yang-Hong, and
boasted that “even stars tremble in front of DSC officers.”
Those who were working at that time did not hesitate to confront me again —
but this time with a higher ranking. They came again to kidnap and murder me.
They answered my questions. It was certainly along the lines of organized and
sustained criminal and terrorist activities. It wasn’t an isolated incident or
an accident.
Meanwhile they have profited — they became more vicious and now they publicly
torture me on the street in downtown Seoul.
It is important to pay attention to the word “philopon,” which is used by Ban
Ki-Moon’s insidious agent — I was confined in the room of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. Until today, I do not know what kind of narcotics they used to
destroy me in Brussels. This manipulative agent —who behaves more like a
criminal working in both Brussels and Antwerp— speaks about “philopon.” He was a
typical agent of Ban Ki-Moon — all along the line from Vice Minister to
Ambassador and up to Consul.
The agents, who were involved in narcotics dealings and crimes, were inserted
into these terrorists activities carried out under the diplomatic thinking or
instructions of President Kim by the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and his
colleagues. This was often observed during the terrorist activities of
Ambassador Choi at Brussels and Brabant. [This demonstrated the organization and
characteristics of criminal power making a profitable business.]
Let’s think about the implementation of your diplomatic thinking and the
instructions of the President and your diplomats’ illegal narcotics trafficking
(illegal drug trade). Illegal drug trade goes side by side with “human
trafficking becoming a booming international trade, making billions of dollars
at the expense of millions of victims” (http://www.ungift.org/). And your agents
and diplomats love to make use of prostitution and women as compensation for my
silence.
 
Where did your diplomats get the narcotics from, which were later used to
destroy a citizen but who did not die in their criminal plots?
It is well known that there is a sizable worldwide lucrative underground economy
based on the production, distribution, packaging and sale of illegal
psychotropic substances such as opium and heroin. It can generate high profits
because there is a huge price difference between the production site and the
final consumer.
On what level are those criminals used narcotics to get their criminal
objects and profits are working?
How did you pay for it? Was it a cash purchase?
Who were the buyers? Who was the purchasing agent?
Who was the supplier? Who are these people?
Since when have your diplomats been using narcotics and other psychoactive
drugs to commit their crimes and terrorists activities for your benefit?
What kind of connection is there between your diplomats and the diamond
smugglers and “Patriot I,”
who played their criminal and terrorist role in 1999-2001 in Brussels and
Antwerp? [Patriot I was one of those people who worked around me in the
period of the plot at NATO military base — the narcotics period.]
Did you get the narcotics on the local drug market —about which you kindly
informed me— in order to facilitate the sure destruction of your victim? The
local market was controlled by Arab drug dealers, as one of your criminals
informed me. What was the purpose of that kindness after the insidious criminal
drugging operation of your diplomats? What was the reason that you recommended
that specific drug market?
Or did your diplomats purchase it in a third country?
Or did you make the narcotics?
If your diplomats produced them, where did you produce them in secret?
Did you smuggle them from a third country?
How did you get them out? [What route?] What was the method of transport?
On what pretext did your diplomats obtain the narcotics?
On what pretext did one of your terrorists —who drugged me with narcotics—
suggest a financially-lucrative business that was later to become a setup to
harm me —just like the diamond smuggling? [As you did, he participated in the
operation “2000 km cycling event between Paris and Berlin” to kidnap and murder
me.]
What is the exact content of this criminal setup, of this
financially-lucrative business?
What kinds of drugs did your diplomats handle?
What kinds of drugs did your diplomats use against citizens — against me?
How did your diplomats, the military attaché and the people related to him
benefit (like job promotions) and how did they take advantage of the secret use
of narcotics against citizens?
What are characteristics of these narcotics used for the criminal activities
committed by your diplomats after your diplomat and military attaché’s plot at
the NATO military base failed? It went beyond political repression. What was the
purpose of drugging me with narcotics after their failure at the US NATO
military base? Why did your people do that?
Ban, who became the UN Secretary General, has a duty to
inform the citizens about the origin and use, the number of transactions and the
amount of narcotics trafficking.
Do not just call for “International human rights!” First, just wash your very
own hands of the criminal acts which take place on transnational scale!
UN Secretary General! Even after you had enough time to think about your
diplomats’ criminal and terrorist activities, you are using more sneaky,
treacherous and villainous methods to cover up the terrorist and criminal
activities organized in Brussels, Antwerp and Atlanta.
That all shows your determination to continue to have your thugs carry out
criminal and terrorist activities all over the world.
Meanwhile you say: “Terrorism hurts all nations — large and small, rich and
poor.” You promote human rights improvements —showing your human rights face to
the world— but you do not stop using young women in an attempt to cover-up your
criminal activities and destroy me. Is it true that you are the Secretary
General of the UN?
UN Secretary General Ban is setting an example of criminal and terrorist
activity to the whole world and he advertises the fact that “I can do it just
like Mr. Ban Ki-Moon,” that is, the
“Ban effect.”
When somebody commits crimes or supports terrorism, including those who are
linked with President Kim’s terrorist network, they can be just like a
high-class gangster who receives big payments and enjoys the conveniences of the
support of political power. These are the serious and detrimental Ban effects,
already with roots on an international scale — proudly shared with other
notorious ones.
Even though Ban made a big profitable business through international-scale
criminal and terrorist activities, what you, as the UN Secretary General, still
enjoy are the more aggressive criminal activities of professional gangsters,
including foreigners under contract, that must be the “Ban effect.”
071004-171009
| 
