In front of President Moo-hyun Roh's Blue House (37) - Champagne and Terrorism - Ban Ki-Moon's human rights oppression and crime protection

I remember vividly that one of agents of president Kim Dae-Jung who denied the value of republicanism and treated this value as a creature passed away. Mr. Kim Dae-Jung was the president of Republic of Korea.

What was the fundamental reason that supported the denial of republicanism of an agent who followed president Kim Dae-Jung who was the president of a republic?

President Roh Moo-Hyun Special lecture in Yonsei University on "Let us cut off the politics-economics and politics-press adhesion." On 27th, the President said, "We have to get rid of the exclusive and privileged 'gangster culture' that remains in our political power." "In the gangster culture, they have strict laws established for themselves. They don’t respect any law toward the outside world. Internally, they have powerful rule, and have strict relations of loyalty and compensation. It is an exclusive privilege group. People in general suffer because there are unfair transactions among them. This is the reason why I am trying to cut off the connection between political and economic powers." May 27, 2004

“The ultimate responsibility of diplomacy is with the President, and I am responsible for implementing the diplomatic philosophy or directions of the President.” April 19, 2005, Minister Ban Ki-Moon, Diplomatic Immunity and Privileges

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. Under President Kim Dae-Jung and President Roh Moo-Hyun. You did not hesitated to employ terrifying methods such as confinement and physical violence in the Ministry, clandestine attempt to intoxicate a citizen with psychotropic drugs in the Ministry, bioterrorism, fabrication of pro-Kim Jung-il anti-American communist and anti-Kim Jung-il pro-American extreme right-winger and numerous attempts to kidnap and murder in European Union.

Principle IV, The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him. Nuremberg Principles